Business
Vietnamese Dissident Gets 7-Year Jail Sentence
Cu Huy Ha Vu, a political activist from an elite Vietnamese family, has been sentenced to seven years in jail for allegedly attempting to subvert the Vietnamese government. Vu is charged with calling for the dissolution of Vietnam’s ruling Communist Party, advocating a multi-party political system, and characterizing the Vietnam War as a civil war. A judge said Vu’s published writings and interviews had “blackened, directly or indirectly” Vietnam’s ruling Communist Party. He will serve three years of house arrest after his release. Analysts say Vu’s unusually aggressive legal activism challenged the party’s authority. They say his high-profile trial raises questions about the future of open dissent in Vietnam. Vu, a 53-year-old activist who studied law in France, was arrested in November as part of a government crackdown against activists and bloggers before a January Communist Party congress. Vu has defended government critics, and in 2009, he twice attempted to sue Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung in connection with a controversial bauxite mining project Vu claimed violated national laws. After his November arrest, Vietnam’s state-controlled press accused Vu of spreading “groundless, fabricated and distorted information” about the state’s leadership and management. Vietnamese activists are commonly charged with spreading anti-state propaganda, but unlike other activists, Vu hails from an elite family. His father Cu Huy Can was an advisor to Vietnamese national hero Ho Chi Minh, and according to a local media report, his uncle Xuan Dieu was a famous Vietnamese poet. An emeritus professor at Australia’s University of New South Wales, Carl Thayer, said before the trial that Vu’s elite roots put Vietnamese communists in an “awkward position.” “How do you challenge someone with that background and say he is really subversive to the state when he comes from a family of such loyalty? State prosecutors and security authorities will try to prevent that connection from being made,” said Thayer. Although Vietnam rejected Vu’s attempts to file lawsuits opposing the Bauxite mining project, Thayer said, Vu’s activism challenged the authority of Vietnamese law. On April 2, Human Rights Watch called for Vu’s release, noting he is one of Vietnam’s most prominent dissidents. Human Rights Watch Deputy Asia Director Phil Robertson told VOA Vu’s trial reflects internal Vietnamese politics and is not connected to recent popular uprisings in Africa and the Middle East. Hours before Vu’s conviction, Robertson said the trial may set the example of how Vietnam responds to criticism by members of its revolutionary elite. “Our assumption has got to be that they are trying to silence him, but I think they are probably looking beyond him also to other persons within the revolutionary elite who might want to raise their voice about what is happening, about corruption, malfeasance, abuse of human rights, land grabbing and the other things that are increasingly being raised by civil society groups from across the spectrum [in Vietnam],” he said. According to Human Rights Watch, Vu’s wide base of supporters includes workers, bloggers, catholic parishioners and land-rights activists.
Cu Huy Ha Vu, a political activist from an elite Vietnamese family, has been sentenced to seven years in jail for allegedly attempting to subvert the Vietnamese government. Vu is charged with calling for the dissolution of Vietnam’s ruling Communist Party, advocating a multi-party political system, and characterizing the Vietnam War as a civil war. A judge said Vu’s published writings and interviews had “blackened, directly or indirectly” Vietnam’s ruling Communist Party. He will serve three years of house arrest after his release. Analysts say Vu’s unusually aggressive legal activism challenged the party’s authority. They say his high-profile trial raises questions about the future of open dissent in Vietnam. Vu, a 53-year-old activist who studied law in France, was arrested in November as part of a government crackdown against activists and bloggers before a January Communist Party congress. Vu has defended government critics, and in 2009, he twice attempted to sue Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung in connection with a controversial bauxite mining project Vu claimed violated national laws. After his November arrest, Vietnam’s state-controlled press accused Vu of spreading “groundless, fabricated and distorted information” about the state’s leadership and management. Vietnamese activists are commonly charged with spreading anti-state propaganda, but unlike other activists, Vu hails from an elite family. His father Cu Huy Can was an advisor to Vietnamese national hero Ho Chi Minh, and according to a local media report, his uncle Xuan Dieu was a famous Vietnamese poet. An emeritus professor at Australia’s University of New South Wales, Carl Thayer, said before the trial that Vu’s elite roots put Vietnamese communists in an “awkward position.” “How do you challenge someone with that background and say he is really subversive to the state when he comes from a family of such loyalty? State prosecutors and security authorities will try to prevent that connection from being made,” said Thayer. Although Vietnam rejected Vu’s attempts to file lawsuits opposing the Bauxite mining project, Thayer said, Vu’s activism challenged the authority of Vietnamese law. On April 2, Human Rights Watch called for Vu’s release, noting he is one of Vietnam’s most prominent dissidents. Human Rights Watch Deputy Asia Director Phil Robertson told VOA Vu’s trial reflects internal Vietnamese politics and is not connected to recent popular uprisings in Africa and the Middle East. Hours before Vu’s conviction, Robertson said the trial may set the example of how Vietnam responds to criticism by members of its revolutionary elite. “Our assumption has got to be that they are trying to silence him, but I think they are probably looking beyond him also to other persons within the revolutionary elite who might want to raise their voice about what is happening, about corruption, malfeasance, abuse of human rights, land grabbing and the other things that are increasingly being raised by civil society groups from across the spectrum [in Vietnam],” he said. According to Human Rights Watch, Vu’s wide base of supporters includes workers, bloggers, catholic parishioners and land-rights activists.
Continued here:
Vietnamese Dissident Gets 7-Year Jail Sentence
Thailand’s open and tightly integrated into global trade economy experienced a V-shape contraction and recovery from late 2008 through late 2009
The continuation of certain government policies, especially the pension to the elderly and free education should also support higher consumption levels for the poor. The longer-term goal of reducing reliance on external demand will take time, especially given political uncertainties that hinder the government’s ability to implement not only its investment program but also needed structural reforms.
Total shareholder returns (TSR) for 2009 are calculated by assuming that investors reinvest all cash received over the course of the year to determine a total return from one’s investment. The 2009 analysis covers 505 companies from the Stock Exchange of Thailand and the Market for Alternative Investment and is based on share valuations as of Dec 31 and dividend payments made over the 2009 calendar year.
There is a growing split in terms of family-run companies. There are those still dominated by the older generation, who are still conservative and don’t want to do much. And there are firms led by the younger generation, who are more active about transparency and investor relations.
The modern Thai capital market can essentially be divided into two phases, beginning with “The Bangkok Stock Exchange” which was privately owned, followed by the establishment of “The Securities Exchange of Thailand”.
The inception of the Thai stock market began as far back as July 1962, when a private group established an organized stock exchange as a limited partnership. The group later became a limited company and changed its name to the “Bangkok Stock Exchange Co., Ltd.” (BSE) in 1963.
Despite its well-intended foundation the BSE was rather inactive. Annual turnover value consisted of only 160 million baht in 1968, and 114 million baht in 1969. Trading volumes continued to fall sharply thereafter to 46 million baht in 1970, and then 28 million baht in 1971. The turnover in debentures reached 87 million baht in 1972, but stocks continued to perform poorly, with turnover hitting an all time low of only 26 million baht. The BSE finally ceased operations in the early 1970s.
It is generally accepted that the BSE failed to succeed because of a lack of official government support and a limited investor understanding of the equity market.
Business
Gordonstoun Severs Connections with Business Led by Individual Accused of Espionage for China
Gordonstoun school severed ties with Hampton Group over espionage allegations against chairman Yang Tengbo. He denies involvement and claims to be a victim of political tensions between the UK and China.
Allegations Lead to School’s Decision
Gordonstoun School in Moray has cut ties with Hampton Group International after serious allegations surfaced regarding its chairman, Yang Tengbo, who is accused of being a spy for the Chinese government. Known by the alias "H6," Mr. Tengbo was involved in a deal that aimed to establish five new schools in China affiliated with Gordonstoun. However, the recent allegations compelled the school to terminate their agreement.
Public Denial and Legal Action
In response to the spying claims, Mr. Tengbo publicly revealed his identity, asserting that he has committed no wrongdoing. A close associate of Prince Andrew and a former Gordonstoun student himself, Mr. Tengbo has strenuously denied the accusations, stating that he is a target of the escalating tensions between the UK and China. He has claimed that his mistreatment is politically motivated.
Immigration Challenges and Legal Responses
Yang Tengbo, also known as Chris Yang, has faced additional challenges regarding his immigration status in the UK. After losing an appeal against a ban enacted last year, he reiterated his innocence, condemning media speculation while emphasizing his commitment to clear his name. Gordonstoun, on its part, stated its inability to divulge further details due to legal constraints.
Source : Gordonstoun cuts ties with business chaired by man accused of spying for China
Business
China Dismantles Prominent Uyghur Business Landmark in Xinjiang – Shia Waves
The Chinese government demolished the Rebiya Kadeer Trade Center in Xinjiang, affecting Uyghur culture and commerce, prompting criticism from activists amid concerns over cultural erasure and human rights violations.
Demolition of a Cultural Landmark
The Chinese government recently demolished the Rebiya Kadeer Trade Center in Urumqi, Xinjiang, a vital hub for Uyghur culture and commerce, as reported by VOA. This center, once inhabited by more than 800 predominantly Uyghur-owned businesses, has been deserted since 2009. Authorities forcibly ordered local business owners to vacate the premises before proceeding with the demolition, which took place without any public notice.
Condemnation from Activists
Uyghur rights activists have condemned this demolition, perceiving it as part of China’s broader strategy to undermine Uyghur identity and heritage. The event has sparked heightened international concern regarding China’s policies in Xinjiang, which have been characterized by allegations of mass detentions and cultural suppression, prompting claims of crimes against humanity.
Rebiya Kadeer’s Response
Rebiya Kadeer, the center’s namesake and a notable Uyghur rights advocate, criticized the demolition as a deliberate attempt to erase her legacy. Kadeer, who has been living in exile in the U.S. since her release from imprisonment in 2005, continues to advocate for Uyghur rights. She has expressed that her family members have suffered persecution due to her activism, while the Chinese government has yet to comment on the legal ramifications of the demolition.
Source : China Demolishes Uyghur Business Landmark in Xinjiang – Shia Waves
Business
Yakult Unveils Restructuring Plans for Its China Operations | ESM Magazine
Yakult reorganized its China operations, dissolving the Shanghai subsidiary while opening a new branch. Manufacturing now consolidates at Wuxi and Tianjin plants, aiming for enhanced efficiency and growth.
Yakult’s Business Reorganisation in China
Yakult has announced a significant reorganisation of its operations in China, aiming to enhance competitiveness and sustainability. The company has dissolved its wholly-owned subsidiary, Shanghai Yakult, which previously managed manufacturing and sales functions. This strategic move is expected to streamline its operations in the Chinese market.
New Branch and Manufacturing Adjustments
Yakult’s head office in China has established a new branch in Shanghai, transferring the sales division from Shanghai Yakult to this location. As of December 6, the branch has started selling various products, including Yakult and its light variants. Meanwhile, the manufacturing plant in Shanghai has ceased operations, with production capacity now absorbed by the Wuxi and Tianjin plants to ensure efficient supply.
Commitment to Growth
The company remains steadfast in its dedication to the Chinese market and is optimistic about future growth. Yakult reassured stakeholders that the reorganisation will have minimal financial impact and aims to enhance efficiency. Founded in 2005 in Shanghai, Yakult China currently employs approximately 2,216 individuals, reinforcing its commitment to customer health and expanding operations.
Source : Yakult Announces Reorganisation Of China Business | ESM Magazine