China
Stumbling blocks to ASEAN-China smart city cooperation
Author: Melinda Martinus, ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute
China is moving full speed ahead in the race for global technology leadership having promoted artificial intelligence, expanded venture capital and funded start-ups worldwide.
ASEAN countries have seen a surge in Chinese capital flows through massive infrastructure projects that have significant smart city elements, including Forest City Johor Bahru, New Clark City, New Manila Bay City of Pearl and Thailand’s Eastern Economic Corridor. China has also shown a great interest in the region’s newly planned township projects, including the Indonesia’s new capital city in East Kalimantan and New Yangon City.
To promote its investments in the region, China has emphasised the opportunity to leverage solutions based on the Internet of Things (IoT) while advertising projects as ‘smart’, ‘green’, and ‘liveable’. This includes the use of sensors, networks and data to optimise public services and enhance liveability through automated energy management, integrated traffic control and faster internet connections in newly built towns. Chinese-owned technology platforms like digital wallet by Alipay, AI adoption and 5G networks by Huawei, and communication platforms by Tencent have also become essential solution providers to enhance public services.
The Chinese government frequently promotes smart city cooperation under its Digital Silk Road Initiative, a significant component of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). In ASEAN, cooperation is enhanced through the ASEAN–China Strategic Partnership Vision 2030 where China has pledged to support ASEAN’s technology transformation initiatives, including the ASEAN ICT Master Plan 2020 and the ASEAN Smart City Network.
Despite lofty ambitions and political buy-in from ASEAN leaders, China still faces technical challenges. Huawei’s failure to win the bid to provide Singapore’s main 5G network demonstrates how aware policymakers are of security and data protection issues. Huawei has frequently faced accusations of enabling espionage by the Chinese government. Huawei’s loss to Nokia and Ericsson also shows how competitive and rigorous the process of bidding for critical infrastructure is in Singapore.
The Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Rail was delayed by land acquisition barriers that have revealed challenges China must overcome to execute large-scale projects in a country that embraces the rights of individual ownership and fully adheres to the land market economy. This experience has also shown the limit of China’s development model even with its extensive experience building large infrastructure projects domestically.
China is yet to create a ‘green’ and ‘sustainable’ image from its BRI projects. Chinese-backed investment projects like Forest City Johor Bahru have received criticism for their detrimental impacts on the surrounding ecosystem by destroying marine biodiversity and polluting waterways. Similarly, the ongoing New Manila Bay City of Pearl project has been criticised for the potentially harmful impacts caused by the loss of both mangrove biodiversity and livelihoods of fisher communities.
There is also concern over trust. Malaysian civil societies frequently raise the issue of equity, questioning how Forest City Johor Bahru will bring employment and affordable housing to local people. The appointment of China Harbour Engineering to conduct reclamation work in Manila Bay has also sparked concerns as the company was involved in a bribery scandal in Bangladesh.
China may also face fierce competition from other players. Although Japan has not yet signed significant deals on large-scale smart city projects, it has recently announced a US$2.4 billion fund to pave the way for companies seeking smart city projects, particularly projects that help ASEAN cities to decarbonise. South Korea has also recently increased funds for ASEAN infrastructure projects through the Korea–ASEAN Global Infra Fund, and the Construction, Plant and Smart City Policy Fund.
Non-Chinese private investors have also started smart city projects in the region. Japanese company Mitsubishi recently announced a joint venture with Singapore’s state-backed investor Temasek Holdings to build a 100-hectare smart city in Jakarta. Amata Corporation, a Thai industrial estate developer, has also started to expand capital in the Mekong countries. The company also sealed deals to build industrial complexes in Myanmar (which has been halted due to the coup) and Laos in addition to its extensive portfolio in Vietnam.
China’s…
China
China and India Foster Trust on the Road to Reconciliation
On October 23, 2024, Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi endorsed troop withdrawals along their disputed border, signaling a shift toward normalcy in China-India relations influenced by economic pressures and pragmatic leadership.
Recent Diplomatic Progress
On 23 October 2024, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met on the sidelines of the BRICS conference in Kazan, Russia. This marked their first delegate-level meeting in five years, during which they reaffirmed an agreement to disengage their militaries along the disputed border. Within a week, both nations initiated troop withdrawals, effectively restoring the status quo to its pre-2020 conditions.
Historical Context of Tensions
The border dispute between China and India, which dates back to colonial times, has led to significant hostilities, including a war in 1962. Both countries have maintained distinct perspectives on the boundary, prompting occasional escalations. Recent tensions have largely arisen from the rise of nationalist leaders and the shifting landscape of international politics, which have intensified the rivalry between the two nations.
Implications for Global Relations
The Xi–Modi meeting drew international attention due to its potential impact on regional dynamics. While some analysts view the disengagement as a positive step for bilateral relations, others suggest it is merely a tactical pause rather than a strategic shift. The outcome of this development remains critical to understanding the interplay between China, India, and the broader global geopolitical landscape.
Source : China and India rebuild trust on the path to reconciliation
Business
Nigeria and China Revive Currency Swap Agreement – Guardian Nigeria
Nigeria and China have renewed their currency swap deal, enhancing economic cooperation and facilitating trade between the two nations, as reported by Guardian Nigeria.
Currency Swap Deal Renewed
Nigeria and China have officially renewed their currency swap agreement, which is vital for strengthening economic ties between the two nations. This deal is designed to enhance trade relations, making transactions more efficient and less vulnerable to fluctuations in foreign exchange markets.
Benefits for Both Nations
The renewed agreement allows both countries to conduct trade using their local currencies, thereby reducing dependence on the U.S. dollar. This initiative is expected to foster economic stability and boost bilateral trade, benefiting businesses on both sides significantly.
Future Prospects
As the agreement takes effect, it is anticipated that Nigeria will experience easier access to Chinese goods and investments. This partnership not only promises immediate economic advantages but also signals a long-term commitment to closer collaboration between Nigeria and China, paving the way for future developments in trade and infrastructure.
Source : Nigeria, China renew currency swap deal – Guardian Nigeria
China
China Restarts Live Rock Lobster Imports from Australia
Australian red meat and live rock lobster exports to China resumed, improving bilateral trade relations after political tensions since 2020. This development aligns with a timetable set by leaders Albanese and Li, enhancing economic ties and benefiting both nations ahead of Lunar New Year.
This announcement comes just two weeks after the resumption of Australian red meat exports to China on December 4, 2024, signaling a broader thaw in bilateral trade relations. The restoration of both live rock lobster and red meat exports follows a timetable set by Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Chinese Premier Li Qiang on October 10, 2024. During a meeting at the ASEAN Summit in Vientiane, Laos, the two leaders agreed to restore the full live rock lobster trade by the end of 2024. The timing of the resumption will allow Chinese consumers to enjoy Australian lobster just in time for the Lunar New Year celebrations, a development that Australian Trade and Tourism Minister Don Farrell described as an “excellent result” for both the Australian lobster industry and Chinese consumers.
The resumption of lobster exports is not only an economic boon but also an important step in stabilizing the broader relationship between China and Australia. China is Australia’s largest trading partner, and the resumption of trade in high-value products like lobster helps to reinforce the importance of a constructive economic relationship for both countries.
In addition to the lobster trade, Australian exports to China have been gradually recovering since the political tensions of 2020. Prior to the imposition of trade barriers, China was Australia’s largest export market for a wide range of goods, including agricultural products, resources, and services. In 2023, China imported approximately US$155.6 billion worth of Australian goods, up slightly from the previous year. Overall, China remains a critical partner for Australia, accounting for over a third of Australia’s total goods exports, with US$204 billion worth of goods traded in 2023 alone.
According to Australian Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry Julie Collins, the resumption of lobster exports is particularly symbolic as it marks the final removal of trade barriers that have plagued the bilateral trade relationship since 2020.
Australia’s trade with China has faced turbulence in recent years, particularly during the tenure of former Prime Minister Scott Morrison. In 2020, Australia’s decision to align closely with the United States and sign the AUKUS security pact led to a sharp deterioration in relations with China, with Australia suffering trade restrictions on a range of products, including barley, wine, lobster, and beef. These disruptions affected an estimated A$20 billion worth of Australian exports.
Despite these challenges, the broader trade relationship has remained a cornerstone of Australia’s economic strategy. China has been Australia’s largest trading partner for over 15 years, and in 2023, China was the largest importer of Australian agricultural products, resources, and services. The Australia-China Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA), which came into force in December 2015, played a crucial role in securing preferential access to the Chinese market, particularly for agricultural products. ChAFTA has also allowed Australia to maintain a competitive edge over other major agricultural exporters like the United States, Canada, and the European Union.
This article was first published by China Briefing , which is produced by Dezan Shira & Associates. The firm assists foreign investors throughout Asia from offices across the world, including in in China, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Singapore, and India . Readers may write to info@dezshira.com for more support. |
Read the rest of the original article.