Connect with us
Wise usd campaign
ADVERTISEMENT

China

Financial Analysis and Cost Audits: Uncovering Cost Inefficiencies

Published

on

Financial analysis and cost audits are vital for identifying unnecessary expenses and supporting cost optimization in companies. By comparing financial data over time, firms can uncover trends, reduce rising costs, and assess the effectiveness of implemented cost-saving measures.


Financial analysis and cost audits are indispensable tools in cost management, essential for evaluating unnecessary expenditures and ensuring the sustainability of cost optimization results.

In this article, we introduce common strategies for financial analysis and cost audits amid a company’s cost reduction efforts.

By comparing financial data over different periods, financial analysis can reveal trends and reasons for cost changes, identifying potential cost-saving opportunities. For example, if an expense is consistently rising without corresponding revenue growth, management might consider reducing that expense or finding more economical alternatives. Additionally, businesses can leverage financial analysis to renegotiate contracts with parties responsible for recurring, substantial fixed costs.  In this context, financial analysis often serves as the initial step in cost optimization efforts.

Furthermore, after implementing cost optimization measures, financial analysis evaluates their effectiveness by comparing data before and after the changes, assessing the extent of cost savings and their impact on profitability.

In accounting, costs are divided into direct and indirect costs. Direct costs include the cost of principal activities, other activities, and taxes and surcharges on operations. Indirect costs encompass selling and distribution expenses, general and administrative expenses, financial expenses, and impairment of assets. For cost optimization purposes, financial analysis should focus on expenses that exceed industry averages or historical data. Initially, accounting analysis is necessary to identify the top costs for the company or industry and those that have significantly increased.

To be more specific, the below issues need special attention:


This article was first published by China Briefing , which is produced by Dezan Shira & Associates. The firm assists foreign investors throughout Asia from offices across the world, including in in ChinaHong KongVietnamSingapore, and India . Readers may write to info@dezshira.com for more support.

Read the rest of the original article.

China

Indonesia president’s diplomatic dash takes in China and US − but a Trump presidency may see the aspiring regional powerhouse tilt more toward Beijing

Published

on

Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto is balancing relations with China and the U.S., pursuing regional stability and leadership while hinting at a shift towards closer ties with Beijing amid a potential Trump administration.

It’s been a whirlwind week for Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto. On Nov. 9, he was breaking bread with Chinese leader Xi Jinping; three days later he was sitting down with President Joe Biden in the White House. In between, Subianto found time to reach out to Donald Trump to congratulate the incoming U.S. president on his election victory.

The visits to the U.S. and China form part of a two-week overseas tour for Subianto that will also take him to Peru, Brazil and the U.K., as well as several Middle East countries.

The itinerary hints at the diplomatic priorities of the newly seated president of Southeast Asia’s biggest economy: balancing Indonesia’s relations with key members of both the West and the Global South, while seeking a more assertive leadership role in Southeast Asia.

Indonesia’s balancing act

Subianto’s back-to-back meetings with Xi and Biden highlight the role Indonesia tries to play in ensuring regional stability and security in the Indo-Pacific.

The meetings coincided with an ongoing U.S.-Indonesian marine exercise off the Indonesian island of Batam. The third annual military exercise of its kind, such maneuvers between U.S. and Southeast Asian partners have tended in the past to be framed as a countermeasure to China’s assertiveness in the contested waters of the South China Sea. But while U.S. and Indonesian marines were engaged in drills, Subianto and Xi were making nice – pledging greater maritime cooperation between the two countries.

The big question now is how a Trump White House will affect Indonesia’s balancing act on security in the Indo-Pacific region.

Trump’s Indo-Pacific strategy

Trump’s first presidency offers some clues into what his second term may look like regarding its Indo-Pacific policy. The 2019 Indo-Pacific Strategy Report issued by the Trump administration marked China as a “revisionist” power – that is, one that is dissatisfied with the current status quo – and an aspiring regional hegemon.

To counter this, Trump adopted an “offshore balancing” strategy – in effect utilizing regional allies to keep China in check. This approach involved security pacts with traditional allies and joint military training exercises with countries such as the Philippines and Indonesia. It also included providing military equipment to partners in the region and occasional U.S. Navy “freedom of navigation” operations.

China’s nine-dash line takes in territory claimed by other nations..
AP Photo/Andy Wong

But there was another side to Trump’s Indo-Pacific strategy. Aware of the U.S.’s lack of direct security interests in the region – no U.S. territories are threatened – but concerned that any escalation could lead to military conflict, Trump was willing to back down on potential flash points with China in the South China Sea in exchange for Beijing’s cooperation in confronting one of the region’s key threats to stability: North Korea.

These two policy tweaks under Trump’s first administration – easing pressure on Beijing in the South China Sea while outsourcing regional stability to Washington’s Indo-Pacific allies – handed to Indonesia a challenge and opportunity.

As Southeast Asia’s largest and most populous nation, Indonesia was required to show leadership in the negotiation of the code of conduct in the South China Sea as part of its key diplomatic mission to maintain regional stability.

Subianto tilts toward China

Indonesia has long been willing to shoulder the burden of managing regional security. Successive leaders have taken the role seriously, especially given the country’s constitutional mandate to pursue an “independent and active” foreign policy. Historically, this has meant Indonesian leaders avoiding being too close to either the U.S. or China in order to boost their credibility as an independent actor.

Chinese President Xi Jinping, right, shakes hands with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto.
Xie Huanchi/Xinhua via Getty Images

But since Subianto was inaugurated as the president of Indonesia in October 2024, Indonesia’s foreign policy has shown a nascent shift away from the West. Days after his inauguration, Subianto sent his new foreign minister to Kazan, Russia, to attend the meeting of BRICS nations and express Indonesia’s desire to join the expanding bloc of non-Western economies.

BRICS’s largest member is China, and the group seeks to position itself as an alternative to Western security and financial architecture.

This formal expression of intent to join BRICS marks a change from policy under Subianto’s predecessor, Joko Widodo.

Furthermore, a joint statement issued during Subianto’s visit to Beijing suggests that Indonesia is starting to entertain Beijing historical maritime claims in the South China Sea.

For decades, Indonesia refused to acknowledge Beijing’s claims on rocks and atolls within Indonesia’s exclusive economic zone in the waters around Natuna – an Indonesian island that intersects with China’s “nine-dash line” denoting the area Beijing sees as Chinese.

But the joint statement issued during Subianto’s visit to Beijing stated that the two countries had reached “an important common understanding on joint development in areas of overlapping claims” that was consistent with “respective prevailing laws and regulations.”

Talk of “overlapping claims” is a departure for Indonesia and suggests that Subianto is willing to move closer to accepting the boundaries set by Beijing in the South China Sea.

OECD or BRICS? Or both?

This isn’t to say that Indonesia is cutting off its options for greater cooperation with the West, too. During the White House leg of Subianto’s visit, Biden signaled the U.S.’s strong support for Indonesia’s push to join the Western-dominated Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

OECD membership would serves as a benchmarking platform for Indonesia, with the organization setting international standards and support for Indonesia to help attract better quality foreign investment.

BRICS membership, meanwhile, would represent more of a political and economic move that would place Indonesia alongside other countries seeking an alternative to the U.S.-dominated international institutions.

The impetus for Indonesia to join could only deepen should Trump’s plan to slap heavy tariffs on overseas goods come to fruition.

Providing cover for Subianto

Certainly, it appears that Indonesia under Subianto could develop a more pro-Beijing stance in the face of a Trump White House.

Wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are likely to take up much of Trump’s immediate attention, pushing issues such as security in Southeast Asia – and more generally in the Indo-Pacific region – further down the list.

Meanwhile, the Chinese government shows no signs of deviating from a policy that includes incremental moves to control the South China Sea and exert its economic influence on nations in Southeast Asia.

Already, some observers are questioning whether Indonesia’s shift in how disputed territory in the South China Sea is discussed is tied to economic cooperation with China that includes the US$10 billion worth of deals signed during Subianto’s Beijing visit.

And a more insular, anti-interventionalist White House under Trump could give Subianto cover to forge Indonesia’s path as a regional leader, encouraging it to do so while also developing closer economic and strategic ties to China and the Global South.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Business

UAE-China Trade Set to Surpass $100 Billion This Year – Arabian Business

Published

on

UAE and China aim to surpass $100 billion in trade this year, highlighting their growing economic partnership and mutual interests in various sectors, as reported by Arabian Business.


UAE-China Trade Growth

The UAE and China are on track to see their trade surpass $100 billion in 2023. This significant milestone underscores the strengthening economic ties between the two nations. The robust growth is attributed to various sectors, including technology, agriculture, and logistics.

Bilateral Initiatives

In recent years, both countries have launched several initiatives aimed at enhancing bilateral trade. These efforts are designed to facilitate smoother cross-border transactions and promote investments. The UAE’s strategic location as a regional hub complements China’s expanding market reach, benefiting both economies.

Economic Impact

This burgeoning trade relationship is expected to create more job opportunities and stimulate economic growth in both countries. As the cooperation deepens, stakeholders anticipate additional advancements that will further solidify UAE-China ties in the global market.

Source : UAE and China trade to pass $100bn this year – Arabian Business

Continue Reading

Business

China Launches Antitrust Investigation into Nvidia, Heightening US Chip Tensions

Published

on

China targets Nvidia with antitrust probe, escalating US chip tensions

China has launched an antitrust investigation into Nvidia, viewed as retaliation against U.S. chip export curbs, escalating tensions between the countries in the semiconductor sector.


China Investigates Nvidia

China has launched an antitrust investigation into Nvidia Corp, following new U.S. restrictions on its chip industry. The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) states that Nvidia may have violated the country’s anti-monopoly laws. However, they did not specify the details of these violations, raising concerns about the increasing tension between the U.S. and China in the tech sector.

Escalating Tensions

This action is perceived as retaliation for the U.S. limiting exports to over 140 Chinese companies, including semiconductor manufacturers. Concurrently, China has enacted bans on critical mineral exports to the U.S., signaling a strong response to American trade actions.

Nvidia’s Market Position

Nvidia previously held over 90% of the AI chip market in China but now faces stiffer competition from local enterprises like Huawei. The company’s revenue from China has decreased, highlighting the significant impacts of ongoing geopolitical frictions on its business operations.

Source : China targets Nvidia with antitrust probe, escalating US chip tensions

Continue Reading